Iraq Article Index : Current 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
Why Geography
 Latest
 News
 
 Most
 Read
 
 Most
 Commented
 Hot
 Topics
Fairy Tales
   Next Article → INTELLIGENCE: China Applies Muscle in America
July 10, 2007: The war in Iraq is notable not because it is against guerillas or terrorists, but because of the large number of  armed opposition groups that are, for all intents and purposes, criminal gangs. Such organizations have been around here for thousands of years, but Saddam made them more powerful by incorporating the loyal ones into his security organization. Maybe it was something he learned from the Russians (the KGB loved to work with gangsters), but it left post Saddam Iraq awash in criminal gangs. Sunni Arab gangs grew rich, Kurd and Shia gangs got constant heat. Many quickly discovered that there was money to be made by giving yourself a nationalistic or Islamic name and declaring  loyalty to the cause of Sunni Arab supremacy. Al Qaeda and Saddam's old allies had cash and cachet that made the gangs more powerful. All they had to do was support the bombing program and attacks on cops and soldiers (local and foreign). Since many of these attacks were paid for, the gangs treated it like another bit of business, even if 90 percent of the attacks on U.S. troops failed. Their paymasters understood.

 

American troops, especially reservists whose civilian jobs were as big city cops , noted the gang aspects of the situation over three years ago. Since American combat divisions and brigades were given a lot of freedom to innovate, some U.S. troops began importing gang fighting techniques from back home. Mainly, this consisted of intelligence gathering techniques, and specialized software used by some police organizations. The newly formed Iraqi police got into this as well, but they were not as effective, because of the pervasive corruption. Unfortunately, the Iraqi police had the manpower on the street, that U.S. forces lacked. Iraqi cops spoke the language, and could quickly size up where a neighborhoods loyalties were.  But the Iraqi police or army never had enough first rate units to take on the gangs.

 

The American databases of Iraq's Most Wanted grew year by year. The databases were eventually merged, and the picture of who was who in the Gangs of Iraq became clearer. Then came the idea that, with enough additional American manpower, one could conduct a targeted gangbusters campaign. The key to making this work long term was the desire of ordinary Iraqis to be done with the gangs. Over the last three years, life had become intolerable in many parts of Iraq, as the gangs began spending most of their time getting rich and, worst of all, doing whatever they liked. The stories of gang atrocities began to sound like stuff you'd only encounter in a horror movie. But then, U.S. intel troops knew that the horror stories of Saddam's street level enforcers were true. With that in mind, the new horrors seemed familiar.  But now the Sunni Arabs were most often on the receiving end, as the gangs sought to insure the loyalty of those they lived among. The gangs had no trouble recruiting. There was little reconstruction going on in Sunni Arab areas. While Iraq's economy, overall, has been growing quickly in the past four years, it's been unending recession in Sunni Arab areas. The gangs offered young Sunni Arab men a job, and a license to do whatever the hell they wanted.  Most Sunni Arabs now wanted the gangs gone, and were in an appreciative mood when American troops came in and took on the outlaws. 

 

The deal was simple. We will run the local bad guys out, killing or arresting those we catch. In return, the local tribe and clan leaders will support recruiting for the local police force, and the tribe will recognize the Shia dominated government. If that happens, then American, or Iraqi, troops will be available if the bad guys try to return and reassert control. Thus peace will return, along with economic growth and a lot less violence in the streets. 

 

The gangs have not taken this new program well. Of the hundreds of gangs in Sunni Arab areas, about half are now banged up and in flight, or essentially destroyed. Still lots of bad guys running around, but without their safe houses, stockpiles of weapons, or piles of cash. When the U.S. troops move it, they start getting lots of anonymous, or not-so-anonymous tips about where the bad guys, and there stuff, is. Even without the tips, the presence of American troops makes other ploys possible. Like the use of many UAVs at night, looking for people moving and burying weapons and other stuff (explosives, radio gear, cash). Raids and car chases follow. Many U.S. troops prefer working the night shift. There's more arrests, the night vision gear is fun to use, and it's not nearly as hot. 

 

The gangs are united by common needs, common enemies, and a desire to see Sunni Arabs running Iraqi again. The chatter among the gangs is that something spectacular needs to be done now,  to prevent the gangs from being hammered into a state of marginalized ineffectiveness. That's where the talk of a "Tet Offensive" comes from. This would emulate the suicidal attacks South Vietnamese guerillas and North Vietnamese troops made in 1969. The idea then was that such a broad offensive would encourage the South Vietnamese population to rise up in support of the communists. Most South Vietnamese were anti-communist, but the communists had convinced themselves otherwise. Militarily, the attacks were a major defeat for the Viet Cong (the South Vietnamese guerillas) and a big setback for the communist effort to take over South Vietnam. But the American media declared it a U.S. defeat, and U.S. government support for South Vietnam declined, reached the point where, in 1975, the second North Vietnamese attempt at taking South Vietnam via conventional invasion worked, because the American Congress had halted even ammo shipments to South Vietnam. 

 

Of course, the situation is different this time. While an Iraqi Tet would also result in a great slaughter against the "guerillas," the only neighboring country capable of invading and taking over is Iran. But Iran is the traditional foe of the Sunni Arabs. So what do the Sunni Arabs expect to achieve by attempting a general uprising? Well, it seems that the Sunni Arabs are still very full of themselves and believe that, if they can force American troops to leave Iraq, they will be able to outsmart and outfight the Kurds and Shia Arabs, and regain control. To understand what's going on in Iraq, you have to understand that fantasies like that are taken very seriously.

 

Next Article → INTELLIGENCE: China Applies Muscle in America
  
Show Only Poster Name and Title     Newest to Oldest
Pages: 1 2
maruben    About Gansters   7/10/2007 12:01:31 PM
the KGB loved to work with gangsters...
 
You forgot to add to your statement that ... the CIA has been so clean and so pure that should be rewarded as MISS SPOTLESS.
 
 
Quote    Reply

FJV       7/10/2007 3:31:55 PM
"CIA has been so clean and so pure that should be rewarded as MISS SPOTLESS."

Compared to the KGB, that's an accurate statement.



 
 
Quote    Reply

judicatr       7/10/2007 5:57:19 PM
 

Well, our dear friend maruben has reminded us all that myopia is not only an ailment of the eye but also a condition of the mind.  This whole notion that ?one man?s terrorist is another man?s freedom fighter? is, to any sensible person, complete rubbish. They are not morally equivalent despite what you may have been told.  Sometimes terrorists are blood thirsty killers and sometimes freedom fighters are fighters for freedom. 

You see maruben there is this notion of justice in support of the greater good. Let me give you an example...
An undercover narcotics cop lies about being an undercover narcotics cop to the drug dealer he is trying to put away.  He has lied that?s true but he?s working toward the greater good. I.E. removing people from civilized society people who would happily sell your 10 year old meth. 

Likewise, if in 1940 a Gestapo Agent in banged on your door and demanded to know whether you were hiding Jews would you have told them: ?Sure here they are.? Or would you have done the right thing and not turned them over to protect the greater good.   

Sometimes in the real world, people make hard decisions. Sometimes they are right sometimes they are wrong. But I?m willing to give a pass to the CIA who has in general attempted to support a free and open society (despite some poor decisions, shady dealings, and missed opportunities) than I am to give a pass to the KGB that for most of its history supported a totalitarian dictatorship.   

Maybe they are the same to you but most rational people can tell the difference. I think you ought to consider that while you sit in your Ivory Tower. And please take all the time you want ? we grown ups need to go about the serious business of actually trying to protect you while maintaining a free and open society. 

 
Quote    Reply

swhitebull       7/10/2007 6:38:16 PM
Hear, hear!!
 
....Maybe they are the same to you but most rational people can tell the difference. I think you ought to consider that while you sit in your Ivory Tower. And please take all the time you want – we grown ups need to go about the serious business of actually trying to protect you while maintaining a free and open society.....
 
 
People sleep peacefully in their beds at night ONLY because rough men stand ready to do violence on their behalf -  George Orwell
 
 
 

 Dizzy: My mother always told me that violence doesn't solve anything.
Jean Rasczak: Really? I wonder what the city founders of Hiroshima would have to say about that.
[to Carmen]
Jean Rasczak: You.
Carmen: They wouldn't say anything. Hiroshima was destroyed.
Jean Rasczak: Correct. Violence has resolved more conflicts than anything else. The contrary opinion that violence doesn't solve anything is merely wishful thinking at its worst. ....When you vote, you are exercising political authority, you're using force. And force my friends is violence. The supreme authority from which all other authorities are derived.
 
 -- Robert A. Heinlein
 
 
swhitebull - as true today as it was when they wrote.
 
Quote    Reply

maruben    KGB   7/11/2007 1:15:45 PM
For me, the argument  "KGB loved to work with gangster" remmember me some Spaniards friends who claim that the fight for democracy during the Military Rule of Franco in Spain was mostly the fight of those people from the Left. In other words, the Left was the only resistance to Franco and should monopilize the all credit for it. I believe that anyone with common sense can see the flaw in their opinions. 
 
Just for the records, I do not see any problem with any Spy agencies working with gangsters. But I strongly doubt the KGB was the only spy organization who loved to work with gangster. Good for the Americans that the CIA can not touch an US national. But, yes it can organize revolutions, coup d'etat, assassinations, invasion and drugs traffic with the help of criminal organization.That stuff, love to work with gangster, was not and is not KGB's monopoly. That is my argument. 
 
Judicatr argues that the KGB and CIA are no equivalent. That is true but I am not talking about that. Also, Judicatr, I can expect anything but not a personal attack, because I do not do that. You do not know me, but you have concluded that I suffer from mental myopia and live in Ivory Tower. Just an advice, run to make conclusion about others, specially without knowing them, is not wise.
 
Have a nice day.
 
Quote    Reply

maruben    KGB (Correction)   7/11/2007 2:04:59 PM
 
For me, the argument  "KGB loved to work with gangster" remember me some Spaniards, who are my friends, and claim that the fight for democracy during the Military Rule of Francisco Franco in Spain was mostly the fight of those people from the Left. In other words, the Left was the only resistance to Franco and should monopilize all the credit for it. I believe that anyone with common sense can see the flaw in their opinions. 
 
Just for the records, I do not see any problem with any Spy agencies working with gangsters. But I strongly doubt the KGB was the only spy organization who loved to work with gangsters. Good for the Americans that the CIA can not touch an US national. But, yes it can organize revolutions, coup d'etat, assassinations, invasion with the criminal support and ignored the drugs traffic of its criminal collaborators.That stuff, love to work with gangster, was not and is not KGB's monopoly. That is my argument. 
 
Judicatr argues that the KGB and CIA are no equivalent. That is true but I am not talking about that. Also, Judicatr, I can expect anything but not a personal attack, because I do not do that. You do not know me, but you have concluded that I suffer from mental myopia and live in Ivory Tower. Just an advice, run to make conclusion about others, specially without knowing them, is not wise.
 
Have a nice day.
 
Quote    Reply

Brian H       7/12/2007 1:08:13 PM
The above argument is OT.

The point is that dealing with gangs is different from dealing with ideologically coherent resistance, and also different from politically ambitious leaders with guerrilla forces, and different from pretty much any kind of civil war.  The pieces are generally smaller, and can be dealt with separately, and the motivations are money and control of vice and corruption.  So it's a different kind of "COIN". 

Too f***ing bad that the surrender-monkeys in the US don't get this, any better than they get what's actually at stake and what the immediate forks in the road actually lead to (and how quickly).

 
Quote    Reply

Brian H       7/12/2007 1:10:32 PM
And further, question to SP:

What do you expect will happen if the "pseudo-Tet" tactic is tried?  You hint, but don't prognosticate.  Please go out on a limb!  Tell all! 

 
Quote    Reply

jak267       7/12/2007 1:14:55 PM
They don't need a "Tet" offensive. The UN has already turned and run, western europe (except for Britain) is engaged in appeasement, the News Media are actively supporting the terrorists, and the Democrats have already surrendered. What more could they possible need to accomplish?

 
Quote    Reply

zav       7/12/2007 1:53:29 PM
"Well, it seems that the Sunni Arabs are still very full of themselves and believe that, if they can force American troops to leave Iraq, they will be able to outsmart and outfight the Kurds and Shia Arabs, and regain control.."

What else you would expecting from them? If they will force American Army out of Iraq, Sunni will take it as a full and complete victory (they will think that even without watching CNN news!)  And after this victory they will quickly become an ultimate super-heroes in eyes of the whole Muslim world. There is NO another scenario, in this situation. Last man standing!

 
Quote    Reply
1 2