Russia Article Index : Current 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
Why Geography
 Latest
 News
 
 Most
 Read
 
 Most
 Commented
 Hot
 Topics
Preparing For The Next Invasion
   Next Article → COUNTER-TERRORISM: Come To Afghanistan And Die
April 14, 2012: The recent government decision to shift over $20 billion in military procurement funds from conventional forces to space and anti-missile projects has met with opposition even within the Russian space agency. Senior space officials were starting their careers in the 1980s when the American "Star Wars" space based anti-missile program appeared. These officials point out that the Russian effort to match the Americans in space played a role in bankrupting the Soviet Union. While this is a contentious issue in the West, the Russians who were working in their space program at the time have bitter memories of hustling to compete with the Americans and failing. Several of those aborted space programs still linger, or were sold off to the Chinese.

Now the Russian leadership is again calling for Russia to be dominant in space. This is seen as a matter of national security, as a way to gain information dominance, and have the ability to fight for control of orbital space. Russian leaders have concluded that maintaining large and well equipped conventional forces is not possible (too few Russians are willing to join the military). Nuclear weapons and their delivery systems (mainly missiles) have been well cared for since the Soviet Union dissolved, and these are seen as Russia's primary defense. To better protect the nukes, and make them more effective, having a large presence in space is considered essential. Otherwise, a foe could launch a surprise attack and destroy Russia's missiles and render the nation unable to respond to a ground threat. Despite this attitude many military commanders would rather spend the money on elite ground forces, new warships, and upgraded aircraft. But for the moment, the Russian defense budget is backing a space based defense.

Meanwhile, Russian military activities are becoming more aggressive. Recently, a modern (S-400) anti-aircraft missile battalion was moved to Kaliningrad, to help defend Russia against another invasion from the west. Kaliningrad is the former German city of Konisgberg, which was captured at the end of World War II and kept by Russia, as the boundaries of Eastern Europe were rearranged in the late 1940s. Until 1991, Kaliningrad was on the Soviet Union's western border. But when the Soviet Union dissolved that year, and more than half the Soviet Union split away to regain their independence as 14 new nations, Kaliningrad found itself nestled between Poland and Lithuania. The small (200 square kilometers, 400,000 Russians, the Germans were expelled 60 years ago) city is still the headquarters of the Russian Baltic fleet and protected by a large force of troops and warplanes. Russia recently activated a new early warning radar in Kaliningrad. Most Russians see bolstering the defenses of Kaliningrad as quite reasonable. You never know when those Western Europeans will invade again.

There are also threats in the east. Last year, more troops were sent to the Kuril Islands and defenses there are being upgraded. This year, Russia increased its reconnaissance flights near the Kurils. All this is in response to Japanese officials pledging to regain ownership of the Kurils. This escalating war of words has been getting worse since the Russian government renounced, last year, a 1956 deal to return two of the four Japanese Kuril islands. Japan has been pressuring Russia to make good on the 1956 promise (made at the time Japan and the Soviet Union resumed diplomatic relations). But Russia has reneged, claiming Japan was plotting to get the other two islands back as well. The Japanese have been pressuring the Russians to return the Kuril islands (off northern Japan) for decades, and this has caused a lot of tension recently. These four islands were seized at the end of World War II and the Russians kept them. The Kurils had been occupied by Japanese for centuries but when Russia reached the Pacific coast in the 17th century, they began to send ships down to the Kurils. In 1875, Japan and Russia signed a treaty settling claims in the area. Japan acknowledged Russia's claim to the larger Shakalin Island to the north, while Russia acknowledged that the Kurils belonged to Japan. After World War II Russia expelled the 17,000 Japanese inhabitants of the four Kuril Islands and Russians were brought in. About 16,000 of these Russians (including many Ukrainians, Koreans, and so on) currently inhabit the islands. There’s not much economic value to the Kurils, except for the good fishing. But it's believed there are oil and gas deposits off shore and valuable mineral deposits on land. Meanwhile, the Russians are still hacked off at losing a war to Japan in 1905, and to Japanese soldiers occupying parts of eastern Russia after World War I. Japan and Russia had a non-aggression treaty for most of World War II. But Russia declared war on Japan on August 15th, 1945 and promptly invaded Japanese occupied northern China (Manchuria). Japanese surrendered to the United States a month later. You could say that Japan and Russia have a lot of unresolved issues.

Russia condemned North Korea's recent attempt to launch a long range missile. Although sharing a short border with North Korea, Russia defers to China when it comes to policy towards North Korea.

The Russian population has declined 1.5 percent (to 142.9 million) in the past ten years. The rate of decline is slowing, as more couples have more children and life expectancy increases. In the next decade Russia may halt the decline. But the non-Slavic (mainly Moslem) Russians are still increasing at a faster rate.

April 13, 2012:  The Russian Navy will continue maintaining a naval patrol off the Syrian coast. For the last year, since the rebellion began in Syria, Russia has had one or two warships stationed off the Syrian coast (along with several more from the U.S. or West European states). Several hundred Russian personnel are building facilities for the Russian Navy at the Syrian port of Tartus, and Russia continues to deliver weapons and military equipment to Syria. Russian state controlled media blames outsiders for the violence in Syria. This programming is similar to the kind of stuff the old Soviet Union constantly used during the Cold War, blaming the West, and especially the United States, for all the world's ills. But most of the world blames the decades old Assad dictatorship for the problems in Syria and condemns Russia for blocking UN action to support the popular rebellion there. The Arab League, in particular, is very critical of Russia. This will cost Russia (arms sales and business opportunities) in the future.

April 12, 2012: In Dagestan a prosecutor was shot dead, apparently by Islamic terrorists.

April 10, 2012: In the Caucasus (Stavropol) two clashes left nine Islamic terrorists dead.

April 5, 2012:  Algeria has hired a Russian shipyard to refurbish two Russian warships (a corvette and frigate) Algeria bought in the 1980s. Most of the electronics will be replaced and all systems, plus the hull, will be upgraded as needed. This is a continuation of a program that has been underway for five years. Several similar ships have already been refurbished and the Algerian Navy is satisfied with the results. These refurbishment projects are helping keep many Russian shipyards alive.

April 3, 2012: In Ingushetia clashes with Islamic terrorists left eight terrorists and one policeman dead. Some of the terrorists were wearing suicide bomb vests.

Next Article → COUNTER-TERRORISM: Come To Afghanistan And Die
  
Show Only Poster Name and Title     Newest to Oldest
midnike       4/16/2012 5:18:02 AM
1. The recent government decision to shift over $20 billion in military procurement funds from conventional forces to space and anti-missile projects
 
Author just have "forgotten" one small detail: $20 billions for 10 years program, including GLONASS (Russian GPS). Two billions per year (it's about 3 percent of Russian defense budget for 2012).  It's soooo huge money...
 
2. Russian military activities are becoming more aggressive. Recently, a modern (S-400) anti-aircraft missile battalion was moved to Kaliningrad
In actuality, the existing Kaliningrad AA unit upgraded their weapon to the next generation model (S-300 to S-400 with anti-missile capabilities). Yeah, the Russian defense weapon on the Russian soil -- it's so aggressive...
 
3. Last year, more troops were sent to the Kuril Islands and defenses there are being upgraded.
 
Oh, yeah! The WWII era tanks' turrets (used as pillboxes) would be replaced with AA missiles TOR-M2 (SA-15 Gauntlet) and land-based anti-ship missiles P-800 Onix (SS-N-26 Strobile). Once more strictly defensive weapon.  It's so aggresive too!
 
4. Japan acknowledged Russia's claim to the larger Shakalin Island to the north, while Russia acknowledged that the Kurils belonged to Japan.
 
The Kurile Islands (and the half of Sakhalin island) were occupied by Japanese in 1905, after Russia defeat in Russo-Japanese war. They've said than that "the war cancels all previous treaties". Then they used Kuriles as base for attacks on Pearl-Harbor (1941) and on US Aleutian islands (1942). In 1945 we've regained Kuriles and Sakhalin, and have done with it.
 
5. But most of the world blames the decades old Assad dictatorship for the problems in Syria and condemns Russia for blocking UN action to support the popular rebellion there.
 
"Most of the world" mean "US and their marionettes"? The real "most of the world" (China, India, Russia and many more) are against the "export of democracy", especially made by such torches of democracy as Saudi Arabia and Qatar are. We already have Libyan example of "the remedy is worse than the disease".
 
 
 
Quote    Reply

Eve    Preparing For The Next Invasion   4/16/2012 12:19:56 PM

Pretty adequate article. But the author gathered together all the facts he ever has known on Russian history, economics and geography. What for did he mention Dagestani and Ingushetian Islamic terrorists?

“…in 1991 more than half the Soviet Union split away to regain their independence as 14 new nations”. More than half of what in the SU? Population? Not true. Russian Federation itself is being more populated than the rest of the ex-USSR... Territory? It has 17 mio sq. km  - the world largest country, that is approx. 2.5 times bigger than total square of other 14 republics… All these discrepancies undermine readers’ trust in what is written in the article.

The ‘Star Wars’ issue is an old and forgotten Mr. Reagan's joke. It’s well known that there was no real ‘Star Wars’ program. It was merely a competition of US and USSR intelligence agencies. And bankruptcy of the USSR was the result not of arms race, but of interior reasons – it was the bankruptcy of communist ideology all the USSR people had to live under. Arms race (at least in rocket technologies) was not lost by Russians – until today they’re leading in major fields of outer space research: Russian-made engines are being bought for US and European rockets, and only Russians currently deliver astronauts to ISS…

To my mind the issue of Russian post-WWII occupation of the former German and Japanese territories is very much biased in the article. USSR won this war. As the winner it took Kaliningrad area (former East Prussia) and Kuril islands – (in the same way US occupied Northern Marianna and other Pacific islands previously controlled by Japan). Japanese army capitulated not only to the US, but also to the USSR in 1945 in Mongolia and China, so as a loser Japan had lost all its Kuril islands... As far as I know Russia now isn’t gonna even discuss the issue with 2 Kuril islands, because ALL of them are Russian in fact. I’m sure they’ll never give a single island back for quite a lot of reasons. First – the important strategic location (all the Russian Kuril islands surround Okhotsk sea, and this converts the sea into an inner Russian basin in which Japan can use only its 200 mile zone north-west of Hokkaido island. This fact is crucial since namely this sea is one of the world’s richest in terms of fishery). Second – 2 islands claimed by Japan are military stations, now being substantially modernized by Russia, and I don’t believe anybody expect they will be ever given away to anybody). Third – already mentioned oil and gas in this area. And the fourth – all the Kuril islands are a symbol of Russia’s revenge after its fleet lost battles with Japanese Empire in 1905.

“Russian state controlled media blames outsiders for the violence in Syria” – the author writes. And what ‘bout German, French and Egyptian media that also write about British instructors and commandos from Lybia/Qatar among “peaceful protesters”. Why does France demand to release more than 100 of its military officers captured in Syria by the governmental forces? Do you want me to give corresponding links? Is this also a Russian media campaign? Who has any doubt that Syrian upheaval is being financed by Saudi Arabia, Qatar, US and UK?.. Oh, c’mon! Let’s speak seriously!

“This [veto at UN and support to Assad] will cost Russia (arms sales and business opportunities) in the future” in its relations with the Arab League, – the author foresee. But I don’t think so. ‘AL’ is an organization with no principles. It has a lot of conflicts and contradictions within itself. It even doesn’t have any unified policy towards Israel. I think traditional users of Russian arms (like countries of northern Africa or Iraq) will go on buying them (firstly because of favorable price-quality ratio of Russian weapons, and secondly because of further radical islamization of all the Arab countries after the most of them got rid of relatively mundane regimes, and due to their further more and more anti-West policy).


 
Quote    Reply