NEW: Follow the Editorial Staff on
StrategyPage Twitter Link


GROUND COMBAT +

AIR COMBAT +

NAVAL OPERATIONS +

SPECIAL OPERATIONS +

HUMAN FACTORS +

SPECIAL WEAPONS +

WARFARE BY THE NUMBERS +

LOGISTICS +

TOOLS +


Visit StrategyPage's US Cavalry Store



Infantry Article Index : Current 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
 Latest
 News
 
 Most
 Read
 
 Most
 Commented
 Hot
 Topics

Off With Their Heads

November 7, 2009: Attacking the Taliban in Afghanistan is far different than similar operations were in Iraq. For one thing, nearly all the operations are in the countryside, in areas where there are few roads. Thus U.S. troops can’t sneak up in quiet vehicles (like hummers and Strykers.) In Afghanistan, the enemy will see you coming, and, literally, head for the hills, before you reach your objective. Even using airborne cell phone and radio jammers (to prevent the sentries from alerting the enemy base) doesn't always work (because flares,  fireworks rockets, flags or signal fires can be used to send the alert). Thus, for most attacks, you come in by air.

Even then, the attack must be planned carefully in order to have the maximum effect. Usually, the objective is to capture or kill leaders, and seize documents, cell phones and computers. A smart bomb can't help much here. Thus you have to get in quick, and be aware of enemy tactics in the face of an attack. The Taliban usually have a retreat plan, with some gunmen assigned to delay the attackers, so the key people can get away along pre-selected routes. So planning the attack calls for some hard thinking, trying to figure out the most likely escape routes, and make provisions for blocking those routes. Most of these attacks take place at night, which provides an edge for the foreign troops, who have night vision equipment, and overhead aircraft and UAVs equipped with night vision cameras.

Some targets cannot escape easily, even in the face of an attack along roads. That is the case when you are going after drug related targets. Starting earlier this year, more attacks were made on drug markets, storage sites and processing labs (where opium is turned into heroin.) Here, you can expect most of the enemy troops to get away, unless some of them attempt to haul some of the heroin (lighter, and much more valuable, than the opium that is scrapped from poppy plants.)

Often, the targets are simply leaders and technical specialists (usually bomb builders. Here, the initial tracking and identifying is done by commandos (U.S. Special Forces and commandoes from many nations). These guys track the terrorist leaders, and also use a network of informants they had developed along the border, on both sides, over the years. The U.S. has also developed electronic and visual surveillance capabilities that provide the commandos with additional eyes, and weapons. The commandos are particularly fond of Predator and Reaper UAVs, which come operators describe as having a full time spy satellite overhead. Commandos, as well as smart bombs and Hellfire missiles. If possible, these key enemy personnel are captured. At the very least, they are killed.

These "decapitation" operations have been on the increase over the past few years. The Taliban and al Qaeda have already figured out what is going on, and are increasingly paranoid when it comes to informers, using their own cell or satellite phones, and the sight of any unidentified aircraft in the area. The terrorists keep changing the way they meet and communicate, yet they keep getting killed. While the terrorists can replace leaders and technical specialists, they cannot replace them with people of equal skill and experience. And as they move into the shallow end of the talent pool, more mistakes are made. Al Qaeda operatives who have fled Iraq to Afghanistan, have noticed, and commented on, the lower level of technical expertise among their Afghan brothers. While most Iraqi terrorists were literate, and some even had formal technical training, most Afghans are illiterate, and any technical training they might have was acquired informally. This has led to more bombs that don't go off on cue, or, worse yet, explode while being worked on, or emplaced. This sort of thing will happen more, as the talent pool gets diluted. The terrorists have a nearly inexhaustible supply of gunmen and suicide bombers from the hundreds of pro-terror religious schools in Pakistan.

Plenty of cash is available from contributions and criminal activities (particularly working for the heroin gangs in Afghanistan). But leadership cannot be bought, nor can you hire technical people to work the high risk (and high death rate) border areas. You have to develop your own leaders and technical people. And if the enemy kills off those leaders and techies too rapidly, the terror operations will collapse. That's how the Israelis crippled Palestinian terrorist operations several years ago, and how the Americans crushed al Qaeda in Iraq, and throughout the rest of the world. Now that solution is being applied to the terrorists in Afghanistan and Pakistan, and the addition of another 40,000 U.S. troops will accelerate the process. While there is always someone willing to step up and replace leaders, the quality of the people in charge declines, and that causes enemy operations to become less effective. Casualties increase, and revenue decreases.

 

submit to reddit
Send Link to a Friend
Next Article COUNTER-TERRORISM: Saudi Arabia Bombs Yemen


Email Me When A New Comment Is Made
Show Only Poster Name and Title     Sort in Reverse Order Posted

Bob Cortez       11/7/2009 7:36:34 AM
At other times and in  other fora, I have emphasised that the true vulnerabilities are in the middle management.  When you kill leaders, you get plenty who are willing to take over though they may be merely bad or perhaps life threatening.
 
In the middle people will not run risks when there is no real upside for them.  When they go, unlike leaders who can be replace with empty man-dresses, they have to perform, and no matter where you look good help is hard to find, and it takes a while to learn the system.
 
I would remind you, that in hedge funds or true Wall Street analytics you serve an apprenticeship, no matter your formal quals and the survival rate is about one in three.  I doubt that such exists on the technical side.
 
Quote    Reply

Dave_in_Pa       11/7/2009 1:32:57 PM
"Now that solution is being applied to the terrorists in Afghanistan and Pakistan, and the addition of another 40,000 U.S. troops will accelerate the process."
 
That's IF Comrade President Barry "Allah-be-Praised" Sotero approves their deployment.
 
Quote    Reply

Gerry       11/7/2009 8:07:45 PM
Apparently the original target of the US and NATO has been replaced by the Taliban. It used to be Al Qaeda. The Taliban fight only because thats what they do in their tribal areas, opium included. Al Qaeda are the terrorists, or at least used to be. Somewhere along the way the US and NATO have lost their focus. Its now rebuilding a nation that never was and chasing taliban that have lived their all their lives.
 
Quote    Reply

WarNerd       11/10/2009 3:39:00 AM

Apparently the original target of the US and NATO has been replaced by the Taliban. It used to be Al Qaeda. The Taliban fight only because thats what they do in their tribal areas, opium included. Al Qaeda are the terrorists, or at least used to be. Somewhere along the way the US and NATO have lost their focus. Its now rebuilding a nation that never was and chasing Taliban that have lived their all their lives.

The Taliban became the target because they refuse to negotiate an end to their support for al-Qaeda.  Actually, they have refused to negotiate at all (Their opening terms boil down to "You give up and leave, then maybe we will think about talking.").
 
In order to win against them we need to put in place a local force that can keep defeating them.  Since the Taliban is essentially the military arm of the Afghanistan Pushtun tribes, who are the largest and strongest of the minorities that make up Afghanistan.  Therefore a local force strong enough to repel the Taliban will have to be a durable alliance of lesser tribes, which is only possible with a strong local government, which Afghanistan has not had for several centuries.  So we end up trying to create one.
 
To be honest, the odds of success without Pakistan doing it's part and shutting down al-Qaeda and both the Afghanistan Taliban and Pakistan Taliban in their country are slim.  But the only alternatives are either to allow what is essentially an al-Qaeda victory by publicly permitting them a permanent base of operations, or countering their reign of terror with our own by systematically exterminating the Pushtun to set a counter example.
 
If you have other alternatives, by all means present them.  But include a reasoned analysis of how and why they will work.
 
Quote    Reply





New Strategy - Wargames at Discount Prices
1.Modern Air Power: War Over the Middle East
2.Commander: Napoleon at War
3.Close Combat: Watch am Rhein
4.Gallic Wars
5.Fast Action Battle: The Bulge

100+ Computer and Board games all with free shipping.
 
 
 

StrategyWorld.com© 1998 - 2009StrategyWorld.com. All rights Reserved. StrategyWorld.com, StrategyPage.com, FYEO, For Your Eyes Only and Al Nofi's CIC are all trademarks of StrategyWorld.com Privacy Policy