Air Defense: Effectiveness of Ground Fire in Iraq


April 5, 2006: During 2005, Coalition forces in Iraq lost a total of 13 aircraft to hostile action, with 11 personnel killed. All but one of the aircraft were helicopters. MANPADs (man-portable anti-aircraft missiles) downed four of the helicopters and the one fixed wing aircraft, with ground fire - primarily small arms - responsible for the other eight helicopter losses. During the year there were reportedly some 1,500 instances of Coalition aircraft being fired upon. That's 3-4 times a day, on average. In over 80-percent of the cases, the fire was from small arms. Much of the ground fire was poorly aimed, or out of range, or struck non-vital parts of the aircraft. MANPADs are thus the more serious threat, but a number of factors reduce their effectiveness, including poor aim, excessive range, and particularly poor maintenance. The bottom line is that less than one percent of the time (once in 115 incidents) that a Coalition aircraft or helicopter is fired on, it will be brought down. There are several hundred Coalition helicopter and aircraft flights a day in Iraq, with less than one percent of them being fired on.




Help Keep Us From Drying Up

We need your help! Our subscription base has slowly been dwindling.

Each month we count on your contributions. You can support us in the following ways:

  1. Make sure you spread the word about us. Two ways to do that are to like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter.
  2. Subscribe to our daily newsletter. We’ll send the news to your email box, and you don’t have to come to the site unless you want to read columns or see photos.
  3. You can contribute to the health of StrategyPage.
Subscribe   Contribute   Close