Counter-Terrorism: Hillbillies Have Long Memories


p> December 6, 2007: Al Qaeda has acquired a lot of franchises in the last two years, some of which are likely to be dangerous. Despite setbacks, al Qaeda Central will continue to support any group that seems to have the remotest chance of making a splash. The Taliban, in contrast, remains dangerous because it has decided quantity is more important than quality. Having lost their best leaders, they've switched over to indiscriminate attacks in great numbers. In fact, the optimal strategy for the Taliban is to fall back and regroup (think Mao's "When the enemy attacks . . . ."). But doing so risks the chance that the government will be able to make important advances on the economic front, thereby rendering the Taliban irrelevant. But if that doesn't happen, they gain time to rebuild their infrastructure, recruit and train better personnel, and emerge from the woodwork when things look better for them.


The Taliban have a tense relationship with al Qaeda, and resist becoming another al Qaeda franchise. During the late 1990s, al Qaeda members treated Afghans, and even Taliban allies, roughly. The Taliban used a brigade of al Qaeda foreigners as "enforcers" when reluctant tribes needed to be punished. Al Qaeda members, especially Arabs, were openly disdainful of the Taliban "hillbillies." None of this has been forgotten, even though the Taliban and al Qaeda openly proclaim their alliance.



Article Archive

Counter-Terrorism: Current 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 2004