On Point: The Opportunity After McChrystal's Relief

by Austin Bay
June 29, 2010

Gen. Stanley McChrystal's relief of command by PresidentBarack Obama has a recent precedent, at least one that involves the issue ofrespect for the military chain of command, a magazine article and the end of afine military career.

In March 2008, following an interview with Esquire Magazine,Adm. William J. "Fox" Fallon, a leader with a stellar militaryrecord, resigned as commander of Central Command and retired from the U.S.Navy.

Esquire portrayed the former carrier pilot as the only manstanding between President George W. Bush and a war with Iran. A seniorAmerican military officer must be prepared to pay the price of relief whenpublicly disagreeing with the commander in chief, the president of the UnitedStates.

Adm. Fallon's opinions weren't the sole difficulty. Hisviews, in a less provocative rhetorical context -- say, a dry discussion ofwhat-if scenarios -- might have raised eyebrows but not hackles. Election-yearrhetorical and political tropes, however, jammed the article."Neo-con" and "Bush" demon connivers threaten the worldwith immolation because they want war with Iran. Yet Fallon stands tall,prepared to be relieved for speaking truth.

As published, the article challenged the system of civiliancontrol of the military, which serves America well. Fallon may or may not havegotten his say -- odds are he did, but as relayed by Esquire they dovetailedwith a perceived elect-a-lefty media agenda.

In the last two years, however, even a few of those mediaand political elites have discovered what a farce it is to attempt to placateTehran's Khomeinists. Obama issued apologies in Cairo and offered negotiationssans conditions. The CIA now thinks the mullahs have enough uranium for twobombs, seemingly revising a controversial assessment from fall 2007 that saidIran would not get nukes until 2015. The problem wasn't the Bush's approach --the problem is bigoted fanatics who want weapons that kill millions.

As for McChrystal: In a press conference on June 24 of this year,Adm. Mike Mullen said, succinctly, "It was clear that ... in its totality,it challenged civilian control ... ."

Mullen's "it" refers to the disrespect forcivilian authority by now-former U.S. Afghanistan commander McChrystal's staff,as portrayed in an article in the current issue of Rolling Stone magazine.President Obama, whose wife until his candidacy was never proud of her country,relieved McChrystal for this disrespect -- not so much for what McChrystal hadsaid, but for his staff's biting criticism of other members of theadministration, including Vice President Joe Biden.

The president should have relieved him. In the long run, forthe good of the republic, it is always beneficial to remind the military who isthe Constitution-authorized boss.

 McChrystal isresponsible for what his staff does -- those are the military's rules, even inan administration stuffed to its appointee brim withthumb-your-nose-at-bourgeoisie-rules campus radicals. It is not clear thatMcChrystal got his say in exchange for his career -- likely he did not.

He appeared to have won the intra-administration debate overstrategy in Afghanistan. But in light of the article, he did seem confidentabout that win. Deep policy disagreements fester in the Obama administrationover Afghanistan. McChrystal's big mistake was failing to express policydisagreements in a professional manner. He and his staff couched hisdisagreements in base, crude terms spiced with locker room panache. RollingStone's correspondent heard it.

President Obama needs to learn that vacillation doesn't winwars. His administration is vacillating, if not fragmenting, over Afghanistan.In the aftermath of McChrystal's relief, the appointment of Gen. David Petraeusgives the administration the opportunity to pursue a focused, coherent policy. 

Read Austin Bay's Latest Book

To find out more about Austin Bay and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate Web page at www.creators.com.


On Point Archives:

On Point Archives: Current 2021  2020  2019  2018  2017  2016  2015  2014  2013  2012  2011  2010  2009  2008  2007  2006  2005  2004  2003  2002  2001



Help Keep Us Soaring

We need your help! Our subscription base has slowly been dwindling. We need your help in reversing that trend. We would like to add 20 new subscribers this month.

Each month we count on your subscriptions or contributions. You can support us in the following ways:

  1. Make sure you spread the word about us. Two ways to do that are to like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter.
  2. Subscribe to our daily newsletter. We’ll send the news to your email box, and you don’t have to come to the site unless you want to read columns or see photos.
  3. You can contribute to the health of StrategyPage. A contribution is not a donation that you can deduct at tax time, but a form of crowdfunding. We store none of your information when you contribute..
Subscribe   Contribute   Close