On Point: Time to Question Presidential Candidates on Missile Defense

by Austin Bay
March 15, 2016

Presidential debate moderators would perform a public service if they ask the candidates -- in both parties -- to publicly state their positions regarding U.S. missile defenses.

A missile defense question addresses immediate and emerging national security threats to America and its allies.

North Korea has ballistic missiles and threatens to use them. On March 13, regime propagandists claimed their state possesses a hydrogen bomb and were it "to be mounted on an intercontinental ballistic missile and fall on Manhattan in New York City, all the people there would be killed immediately and the city would burn down to ashes."

North Korea recently test-fired a missile that may have intercontinental range; it claims it has miniaturized nuclear weapons. Translation: it can put nukes on missiles.

On March 10, Admiral William Gortney, commander of U.S. Northern Command and North American Aerospace Defense Command, told the Senate that it is "prudent" to assume North Korea has miniaturized nuclear weapons and can target the U.S.

U.S. missile defenses help deter attack. North Korea can't be certain its missiles will get through. Anti-ballistic missiles also provide protection should regime psychopaths gamble and launch.

Iran is another problem. On March 10, Iran launched two intermediate range ballistic missiles. A vicious message, in Hebrew, was painted on the missile boosters: "Israel must be wiped out."

America's U.N. ambassador called the launches ""provocative and destabilizing." Secretary of State John Kerry said Iran had violated U.N. resolutions. Security Council Resolution 2231 forbids Tehran from launching nuclear-capable missiles.

Iran claimed the launches don't violate any U.N. resolutions and don't violate President Barack Obama's "P5+1" Iran nuclear weapons deal.

Iran's dictators read the president's vaguely worded but majestically-named Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (2015 nuclear deal) and conclude they can build any missile they desire, as long as they assure the world the missile won't bear a nuke warhead.

Get real. The missiles Iran is developing are integral components of a nuclear war-fighting program. The president's nuclear deal freed up billions of dollars for Tehran to use to procure advanced missiles.

Iran's current missiles have a range of some 2,000 kilometers; Persian Gulf Arab states, Turkey and Israel already face attack. Cairo is right at max range. Iran's next generation solid fuel ballistic missile will likely have a 2,500 kilometer range. The mullahs can nuke Black Sea NATO nations.

Israel intends to protect itself. In December 2015, Israel successfully tested the Arrow 3, a high altitude ABM.

Attention debate moderators: Israel and the U.S. jointly developed the Arrow 3. The missile is the offspring of President Ronald Reagan's Strategic Defense Initiative. Remember how Democrats ridiculed SDI? Ask the candidates whether the ridicule was shortsighted, or just a result of plain ignorant partisanship.

South Korea says a medium-range U.S. Terminal High Altitude Area Defense ABM battery will improve its security. In February, Japan deployed a short-range U.S. Patriot PAC-3 launcher in downtown Tokyo, in case North Korea's test missile headed for the city.

The U.S. and Japanese navies both have the capable Aegis ABM system on Aegis warships. To counter North Korea, Hawaii may receive an Aegis Ashore battery. NATO is in the process of deploying Aegis Ashore missiles in Eastern Europe -- to protect European NATO nations from a missile fired from ... Iran's direction.

ADM Gortney testified that the U.S. needs improved missile defenses "to engage the (missile) threat throughout its flight, keep them on the ground, kill them on the (launch) rails, kill them in boost phase" and also be able to destroy warheads "in space in mid-course."

Apparently, Gortney wants more Ground Based Mid-Course Defense interceptors, which provide limited defense against ICBMs. Pricey GMDs intercept enemy missiles in outer space. In 2010 the US had 30 GMDs. Obama Administration initially opposed more GMDs then in 2013 authorized buying 14 more.

Attention debate moderators: Ask the candidates to analyze the missile threat America confronts. Quote ADM Gortney. Ask the candidates if they agree with him. If they don't, why not? If they do, will they give missile defense the budget slice it needs?

Read Austin Bay's Latest Book

To find out more about Austin Bay and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate Web page at www.creators.com.


On Point Archives:

On Point Archives: Current 2023  2022  2021  2020  2019  2018  2017  2016  2015  2014  2013  2012  2011  2010  2009  2008  2007  2006  2005  2004  2003  2002  2001



Help Keep Us From Drying Up

We need your help! Our subscription base has slowly been dwindling.

Each month we count on your contributions. You can support us in the following ways:

  1. Make sure you spread the word about us. Two ways to do that are to like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter.
  2. Subscribe to our daily newsletter. We’ll send the news to your email box, and you don’t have to come to the site unless you want to read columns or see photos.
  3. You can contribute to the health of StrategyPage.
Subscribe   Contribute   Close