Infantry: Oh, the Horror, the Horror

Archives

August 28, 2007: The British media were in an uproar recently when it was announced that the British army was purchasing American M72A9 portable rocket launchers for its troops in Afghanistan. The A9 version of the M72 is an eight pound, one shot rocket launcher with a warhead described as optimized for destroying structures. The British media immediately jumped to the conclusion that the A9 used a thermobaric (fuel-air explosive) warhead. Shoulder fired rockets with thermobaric warheads have been used in Iraq, by American troops, since 2004. This type of warhead, when it goes off inside a building, or cave, first disperses a combustible mist, which is then ignited, producing an enormous explosion, that often destroys small buildings, and kills everyone in the room, and adjacent rooms and hallways. European media have demonized thermobaric weapons, depicting them as inhumane.

Exactly how a thermobaric explosive is less humane than any other weapon is never investigated with much vigor. Apparently thermobaric is bad, if only because the Americans use them. Actually, it was the Russians who first developed small thermobaric warheads. Since the Europeans consider the Russians a bunch of barbarians (a centuries old tradition, which goes a long way to explain why the Russians are so leery of Western Europeans), this all somehow fits together.

The exact composition of the A9 warhead is kept secret, but from the description that is given (lots of blast and not much heat) it is apparently a slower burning explosive. This would produce a "longer explosion", that would tend to bring down structures. Nothing new here. Scientists have been manipulating the "burn rate" of explosives for over a century. The slowest burning explosives are used as rocket motors. That's all a "solid fuel" rocket motor is; a very slow burning explosive. Otherwise, the speed at which the explosive burns varies depending on what you are blowing up, and for what reason. Most of this has to do with industrial, not military, uses of explosives.

Europeans have a long history of trying to outlaw "inhumane" weapons. One of the earliest efforts was against the cross bow. However, this terrible weapon (which enabled a poorly trained commoner to easily bring down an armored aristocrat on horseback), could be used against Moslems, and other non-Christians. The $2,500 M72A9 will mostly be used to kill Moslems.

 


Article Archive

Infantry: Current 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 2001 2000 1999 


X

ad
0
20

Help Keep Us Soaring

We need your help! Our subscription base has slowly been dwindling. We need your help in reversing that trend. We would like to add 20 new subscribers this month.

Each month we count on your subscriptions or contributions. You can support us in the following ways:

  1. Make sure you spread the word about us. Two ways to do that are to like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter.
  2. Subscribe to our daily newsletter. We’ll send the news to your email box, and you don’t have to come to the site unless you want to read columns or see photos.
  3. You can contribute to the health of StrategyPage. A contribution is not a donation that you can deduct at tax time, but a form of crowdfunding. We store none of your information when you contribute..
Subscribe   Contribute   Close