Information Warfare: Lawfare Lets Terrorists Down For Once


February26, 2007: In what has to be a turn of the tide in the legal theater of the war on terror, an American federal appeals court has ruled that terrorism detainees do not have access to the U.S. court system. This was the result of the passage of the Military Commissions Act last year. The passage of this act was brought about as the result of increasing lawfare against the Department of Defense. Much of this came from human rights groups like Amnesty International and the Center for Constitutional Rights. As a result of these rulings, Congress passed legislation that was intended to put an end to this.

The lawfare generally targeted the Department of Defense, with both the National Security Agency and the camps at Guantanamo Bay as the major targets. From the time the first terrorists were captured in the war on terror and placed into military custody, lawsuits have been filed by human rights groups - often with the intention of hindering efforts by the United States to wage the war on terror.

The detainee issue has been the biggest subject of litigation. The human rights groups have wanted to maintain the previous approach of putting terrorists on trial like ordinary criminals. There has just been one problem with that. In the United States, there is a discovery process, in which the prosecution must turn over information to the defense. In doing so, terrorists got the same rights as other criminals. In 1995, during the trial of Omar Abdel Rahman, a leader of Egyptian Islamic Jihad, the United States handed over a list of over 200 people to Rahman's lawyers in compliance with those laws. That information eventually found its way to al-Qaeda headquarters. Even as terrorists were put away, al-Qaeda was tipped off as to what the United States knew.

Naturally, protecting intelligence sources became a paramount concern. Hence, the decision was made that the United States would try terrorist leaders in military commissions, where the classified information could be prevented from falling into the hands of terrorists still out there. However, the human rights groups still sued over this, and eventually got a series of court rulings that led to the Military Commissions Act. The legislation clarified rules concerning what is and is not allowed with regards to the treatment of detainees, due to the Supreme Court's interpretation of the Geneva conventions in Hamdan v. Rumsfeld. Despite the fact it prohibits torture, physical abuse, murder, rape, sexual assault, hostage taking, intentionally causing serious injury, or performing biological experiments on prisoners, human rights groups want it repealed.

Several leaders in the new Democratic Congress, like Senator Patrick Leahy, have announced their intention to restore detainees' access to the courts despite the problems shown in the past when American rules of discovery led to intelligence being compromised. These leaders have far more concern for the rights of terrorists than they do for the rights of innocent people to not be killed or maimed in a bombing, or kidnapped and beheaded. - Harold C. Hutchison ([email protected])




Help Keep Us From Drying Up

We need your help! Our subscription base has slowly been dwindling.

Each month we count on your contributions. You can support us in the following ways:

  1. Make sure you spread the word about us. Two ways to do that are to like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter.
  2. Subscribe to our daily newsletter. We’ll send the news to your email box, and you don’t have to come to the site unless you want to read columns or see photos.
  3. You can contribute to the health of StrategyPage.
Subscribe   Contribute   Close