Warplanes: February 26, 2000


The Air Force admits that it has done a poor job of explaining the differences between the Joint Strike Fighter and the F-22 Raptor to Congress, which continues to question why the US needs both of these expensive aircraft. The Air Force notes that the JSF has lower performance, a less capable radar, and a larger radar signature than the F-22, but that bringing the JSF up to F-22 standards would double its price. The JSF is also better able to operate at lower altitudes and carries more bombs. The JSF's radar is capable of both air-to-air and air-to-ground targeting; the F-22's radar cannot really track ground targets but is vastly superior for air-to-air work. For either plane to do the other's job, it would have to radically increase in price or give up much of its specialized advantages. --Stephen V Cole




Help Keep Us From Drying Up

We need your help! Our subscription base has slowly been dwindling.

Each month we count on your contributions. You can support us in the following ways:

  1. Make sure you spread the word about us. Two ways to do that are to like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter.
  2. Subscribe to our daily newsletter. We’ll send the news to your email box, and you don’t have to come to the site unless you want to read columns or see photos.
  3. You can contribute to the health of StrategyPage.
Subscribe   Contribute   Close