Information Warfare: The Dead Babies Strategy


February 3, 2009: NATO and U.S. commanders are crafting a new information campaign that will capitalize on the fact that it's the Taliban, not foreign troops, who are the greatest danger to Afghan civilians. This is because one Taliban strategy that is working is to simply make a big deal in the media whenever foreign troops kill Afghan civilians (about 80 percent of civilian deaths are caused by the Taliban, but that has successfully been played down, a real spin victory for the Islamic radicals). This caused NATO commanders to issue increasingly restrictive rules of engagement (ROE) to their troops, which the Taliban eagerly exploit to save their butts in combat.

Noting that the bad press and more restrictive ROE were a double victory for the Taliban, the foreign commanders are loosening the ROE and trying to make their case to the Afghan public that the Taliban are the real danger to Afghan civilians, and many of the civilian deaths are either Taliban fighters, or their families. In addition, many of the civilians are killed because the Taliban were using them as human shields.

Such a media campaign is going to run up against some difficulties foreign commanders would rather not discuss openly. First, there's the general (and ancient) dislike of foreigners by Afghans. This manifests itself in many ways, one of them being more sensitivity to deaths caused by foreigners, than those caused by other Afghans. Then there's the hostility of the Afghan and foreign (especially Moslem) media to the presence of foreign troops in Afghanistan. This hostility isn't always rational. Journalists know that, if the Taliban ran the country, as they did in the late 1990s, journalists would be persecuted and killed. But criticizing foreign troops is a good source of profitable headlines. The Afghan media, in particular, finds it safer and more profitable to criticize foreigners killing civilians, rather than jumping all over the Taliban. That's because the Taliban, and their drug gang allies, threaten or bribe local (and a few foreign) journalists to insure that the foreign troops look bad, and the local guys look good. It's the old "offer you can't refuse" ("do it our way or die.") If the offer comes with a bribe, most journalists are prone to take the money and live.

Taking all the unspoken media problems in Afghanistan, the new NATO/U.S. media campaign should be interesting.


Article Archive

Information Warfare: Current 2022 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 2001 2000 1999 



Help Keep Us Soaring

We need your help! Our subscription base has slowly been dwindling. We need your help in reversing that trend. We would like to add 20 new subscribers this month.

Each month we count on your subscriptions or contributions. You can support us in the following ways:

  1. Make sure you spread the word about us. Two ways to do that are to like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter.
  2. Subscribe to our daily newsletter. We’ll send the news to your email box, and you don’t have to come to the site unless you want to read columns or see photos.
  3. You can contribute to the health of StrategyPage. A contribution is not a donation that you can deduct at tax time, but a form of crowdfunding. We store none of your information when you contribute..
Subscribe   Contribute   Close