Murphy's Law: January 4, 2004


One unspoken reason for introducing UCAVs (combat aircraft without pilots) is that it will save the lives of hundreds of pilots, even if the UCAVs are never used in a war. In the last three decades, it became normal for far more pilots to be killed in training accidents than in combat. There hasn't been much combat, but there has been a lot of training. For example, in it's first two decades of use, 265 F-16s were lost, and 98 percent of those were lost in training accidents. During that same period, 95 percent of the sorties were for training. Because they have no pilots on board, there is not much training time in the air for UCAVs. The ground based pilots will train mostly on simulators, while a small number of UCAV flights will be made to test the reliability of the mechanical, electronic and software components. Deaths from flying accidents for UCAV "pilots" will be zero. However, the air force insistence on UAV and UCAV "pilots" be actual flying officers means that these UAV pilots will have to go fly something periodically in order to maintain their flight status. But this flying will probably not be in high performance (and more dangerous) fighters, but probably trainers and transports.




Help Keep Us From Drying Up

We need your help! Our subscription base has slowly been dwindling.

Each month we count on your contributions. You can support us in the following ways:

  1. Make sure you spread the word about us. Two ways to do that are to like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter.
  2. Subscribe to our daily newsletter. We’ll send the news to your email box, and you don’t have to come to the site unless you want to read columns or see photos.
  3. You can contribute to the health of StrategyPage.
Subscribe   Contribute   Close