Murphy's Law: Tech Versus Determination

Archives

March 27, 2013: With the U.S. and other nations spending billions on developing and building a new generation of stealth aircraft, there is still a lot of uncertainty about how effective stealth will be in combat. Over the last two decades there have been many efforts to come up with effective ways to spot stealth aircraft and bring them down. In 1999, the Serbs used a number of these techniques to detect and shoot down an F-117. Since then several other methods have been developed, and the U.S. Air Force says it has developed countermeasures. The problem is you will never know if these work until there is an actual war involving stealth aircraft going up against creditable air defenses manned by clever personnel. One has to be particularly careful going up against the Chinese or Iranians.

Another lesson to be kept in mind is what happened with radar (BVR or Beyond Visual Range) guided air-to-air missiles in 1991 over Iraq. While 1991 was the first air battle featuring large scale use of BVR missiles. What was not mentioned was that most of those missiles that took down a target did it at close range, where a heat-seeking missile could be used.

It was also not reported (at least not vigorously) that unguided (dumb) bombs were still sometimes a cheaper weapon for getting the job done. Carpet bombing of enemy ground units, even those with a lot of armored vehicles, was very effective and much cheaper than using guided bombs. In fact the most cost effective aircraft for taking out ground targets were the A-10 (which the air force has been trying to retire for over two decades) and the F-16 (a very flexible and low cost aircraft designed mainly for air-to-air combat). All this means that foes not equipped with the latest tech but with well trained and aggressive pilots can be a real threat.

 


Article Archive

Murphy's Law: Current 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 2001 2000 1999 


X

ad
$0
$2500

Don't Let Us Go Up In Smoke!

January, February and March are notoriously low ad revenue months online. And StrategyPage has not been spared. We need to raise $2500 in combined subscriptions and contributions to keep us moving forward.

Each month we count on your subscriptions or contributions. You can support us in the following ways:

  1. Make sure you spread the word about us. Two ways to do that are to like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter.
  2. Subscribe to our daily newsletter. We’ll send the news to your email box, and you don’t have to come to the site unless you want to read columns or see photos.
  3. You can contribute to the health of StrategyPage. A contribution is not a donation that you can deduct at tax time, but a form of crowdfunding. We store none of your information when you contribute..
Subscribe   Contribute   Close