Strategic Weapons: August 9, 2000

Archives

Critics of the National Missile Defense system have noted, with some hysteria, that because of the short response time to incoming missiles, the decision to fire an interceptor will almost certainly be made by a colonel or brigadier general in a control bunker, not by the civilian leadership. This, the critics argue, is an unthinkable deviation from the principle of civilian control since a military officer could "take the country to war" before the President knew we were under attack. The criticism seems a bit disconnected from reality, as the National Missile Defense system could not attack any other country, nor could it engage an innocent satellite that would already be too high for its interceptors to reach. Not to mention that if a nuclear missile needs to be intercepted, the technical question of being in a state of war has become largely moot.--Stephen V Cole

 


Article Archive

Strategic Weapons: Current 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 2001 2000 1999 


X

ad
0
20

Help Keep Us Soaring

We need your help! Our subscription base has slowly been dwindling. We need your help in reversing that trend. We would like to add 20 new subscribers this month.

Each month we count on your subscriptions or contributions. You can support us in the following ways:

  1. Make sure you spread the word about us. Two ways to do that are to like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter.
  2. Subscribe to our daily newsletter. We’ll send the news to your email box, and you don’t have to come to the site unless you want to read columns or see photos.
  3. You can contribute to the health of StrategyPage. A contribution is not a donation that you can deduct at tax time, but a form of crowdfunding. We store none of your information when you contribute..
Subscribe   Contribute   Close