CIC 474

Past Issues
CIC 473
CIC 472
CIC 471
CIC 470
CIC 469
CIC 468
CIC 467
CIC 466
CIC 465
CIC 464
CIC 463
CIC 462
CIC 461
CIC 460
CIC 459
CIC 458
CIC 457
CIC 456
CIC 455
CIC 454
CIC 453
CIC 452
CIC 451
CIC 450
CIC 449
CIC 448
CIC 447
CIC 446
CIC 445
CIC 444
CIC 443
CIC 442
CIC 441
CIC 440
CIC 439
CIC 438
CIC 437
CIC 436
CIC 435
CIC 434
CIC 433
CIC 432
CIC 431
CIC 430
CIC 429
CIC 428
CIC 427
CIC 426
CIC 425
CIC 424
CIC 423
CIC 422
CIC 421
CIC 420
CIC 419
CIC 418
CIC 417
CIC 416
CIC 415
CIC 414
CIC 413
CIC 412
CIC 411
CIC 410
CIC 409
CIC 408
CIC 407
CIC 406
CIC 405
CIC 404
CIC 403
CIC 402
CIC 401
CIC 400
CIC 399
CIC 398
CIC 397
CIC 396
CIC 395
CIC 394
CIC 393
CIC 392
CIC 391
CIC 390
CIC 389
CIC 388
CIC 387
CIC 386
CIC 385
CIC 384
CIC 383
CIC 382
CIC 381
CIC 380
CIC 379
CIC 378
CIC 377
CIC 375
CIC 374
CIC 373
CIC 372
CIC 371
CIC 370
CIC 369
CIC 368
CIC 367
CIC 366
CIC 365
CIC 364
CIC 363
CIC 362
CIC 361
CIC 360
CIC 359
CIC 358
CIC 357
CIC 356
CIC 355
CIC 354
CIC 353
CIC 352
CIC 351
CIC 350
CIC 349
CIC 348
CIC 347
CIC 346
CIC 345
CIC 344
CIC 343
CIC 342
CIC 341
CIC 340
CIC 339
CIC 338
CIC 337
CIC 336
CIC 335
CIC 334
CIC 333
CIC 332
CIC 331
CIC 330
CIC 329
CIC 328
CIC 327
CIC 326
CIC 325
CIC 324
CIC 323
CIC 322
CIC 321
CIC 320
CIC 319
CIC 318
CIC 317
CIC 316
CIC 315
CIC 314
CIC 313
CIC 312
CIC 311
CIC 310
CIC 309
CIC 308
CIC 307
CIC 306
CIC 305
CIC 304
CIC 303
CIC 302
CIC 301
CIC 300
CIC 299
CIC 298
CIC 297
CIC 296
CIC 295
CIC 294
CIC 293
CIC 292
CIC 291
CIC 290
CIC 289
CIC 288
CIC 287
CIC 286
CIC 285
CIC 284
CIC 283
CIC 282
CIC 281
CIC 280
CIC 279
CIC 278
CIC 277
CIC 276
CIC 275
CIC 274
CIC 273
CIC 272
CIC 271
CIC 270
CIC 269
CIC 268
CIC 267
CIC 266
CIC 265
CIC 264
CIC 263
CIC 262
CIC 261
CIC 260
CIC 259
CIC 258
CIC 257
CIC 256
CIC 255
CIC 254
CIC 253
CIC 252
CIC 251
CIC 250
CIC 249
CIC 248
CIC 247
CIC 246
CIC 245
CIC 244
CIC 243
CIC 242
CIC 241
CIC 240
CIC 239
CIC 238
CIC 237
CIC 236
CIC 235
CIC 234
CIC 233
CIC 232
CIC 231
CIC 230
CIC 229
CIC 228
CIC 227
CIC 226
CIC 225
CIC 224
CIC 223
CIC 222
CIC 221
CIC 220
CIC 219
CIC 218
CIC 217
CIC 216
CIC 215
CIC 214
CIC 213
CIC 212
CIC 211
CIC 210
CIC 209
CIC 208
CIC 207
CIC 206
CIC 205
CIC 204
CIC 203
CIC 202
CIC 201
CIC 200
CIC 199
CIC 198
CIC 197
CIC 196
CIC 195
CIC 194
CIC 193
CIC 192
CIC 191
CIC 190
CIC 189
CIC 188
CIC 187
CIC 186
CIC 185
CIC 184
CIC 183
CIC 182
CIC 181
CIC 180
CIC 179
CIC 178
CIC 177
CIC 176
CIC 175
CIC 174
CIC 173
CIC 172
CIC 171
CIC 170
CIC 169
CIC 168
CIC 167
CIC 166
CIC 165
CIC 164
CIC 163
CIC 162
CIC 161
CIC 160
CIC 159
CIC 158
CIC 157
CIC 156
CIC 155
CIC 154
CIC 153
CIC 152
CIC 151
CIC 150
CIC 149
CIC 148
CIC 147
CIC 146
CIC 145
CIC 144
CIC 143
CIC 142
CIC 141
CIC 140
CIC 139
CIC 138
CIC 137
CIC 136
CIC 135
CIC 134
CIC 133
CIC 132
CIC 131
CIC 130
CIC 129
CIC 128
CIC 127
CIC 126
CIC 125
CIC 124
CIC 123
CIC 122
CIC 121
CIC 120
CIC 119
CIC 118
CIC 117
CIC 116
CIC 115
CIC 114
CIC 113
CIC 112
CIC 111
CIC 110
CIC 109
CIC 108
CIC 107
CIC 106
CIC 105
CIC 104
CIC 103
CIC 102
CIC 101
CIC 100
CIC 99
CIC 98
CIC 97
CIC 96
CIC 95
CIC 94
CIC 93
CIC 92
CIC 91
CIC 90
CIC 89
CIC 88
CIC 87
CIC 86
CIC 85
CIC 84
CIC 83
CIC 82
CIC 81
CIC 80
CIC 79
CIC 78
CIC 77
CIC 76
CIC 75
CIC 74
CIC 73
CIC 72
CIC 71
CIC 70
CIC 69
CIC 68
CIC 67
CIC 66
CIC 65
CIC 64
CIC 63
CIC 62
CIC 61
CIC 60
CIC 59
CIC 58
CIC 57
CIC 56
CIC 55
CIC 54
CIC 53
CIC 52
CIC 51
CIC 50
CIC 49
CIC 48
CIC 47
CIC 46
CIC 45
CIC 44
CIC 43
CIC 42
CIC 41
CIC 40
CIC 39
CIC 38
CIC 37
CIC 36
CIC 35
CIC 34
CIC 33
CIC 32
CIC 31
CIC 30
CIC 29
CIC 28
CIC 27
CIC 26
CIC 25
CIC 24
CIC 23
CIC 22
CIC 21
CIC 20
CIC 19
CIC 18
CIC 17
CIC 16
CIC 15
CIC 14
CIC 13
CIC 12
CIC 11
CIC 10
CIC 9
CIC 8
CIC 7
CIC 6
CIC 5
CIC 4
CIC 3
CIC 2
CIC 1

Wargaming for the Great War

Although some practices in earlier times presaged the invention of the wargame, the systematic development of the use of game theory to help study military history, to aid officers in learning their trade, and to explore alternative approaches to solving tactical or strategic problems began in Prussia early in the nineteenth century. After Prussia’s spectacular victory over the French in 1870, other armies began adopting various Prussian practices, notably frequent maneuvers and wargaming. By the eve of the Great War all the major European armies were using wargaming to a greater or lesser extent in developing war plans.

Wargames, however, are not predictive. The important part of the game is not who “wins” or who “loses.” The design and playing of wargames allow options to be explored, alternative courses of action to be examined, and, perhaps most importantly, questions to be raised. The “lessons” are about how the ideas and assumptions that went into its design as well as the situations, solutions, and questions that arose during its play can be analyzed and addressed in post-game critiques in order to throw light on the “real world” situation.

German use of wargaming during the mid-1890s was instrumental in convincing Chief-of-the-Great-General Staff Alfred von Schlieffen that a frontal attack into France from Lorraine was probably a bad idea. This ultimately led him to conceive of the right wing sweep into the French rear through Belgium that became the core of the German war plan of 1914. Moreover, as Erich Ludendorff noted in his war memoirs, the sweep through Belgium “was based on the assumption that France would not respect Belgian neutrality or that Belgium would join France. . . . Any other plan of campaign would have been crippled owing to the danger from Belgium to the German right flank, and would have precluded a quick and decisive blow at France, which was essential in order to meet in time the great danger of a Russian invasion into the heart of Germany.”

In 1905 Schlieffen ran his last wargames. Several scenarios were played, in at least one of which the French were only played by a couple of junior staff officers, hardly a fair match against more seasoned and senior officers. The final game in the series presumed a German strategic defensive against simultaneous French and Russian offensives. Schlieffen took advantage of Germany’s central position to use 15 active or reserve corps to crush the Russians, while holding off the French with only eight corps.

In the East, the Germans used their superior rail connections to execute an elaborate envelopment of one of the invading Russian armies and threw back the other, a scenario that had already been played repeatedly, with an outcome remarkably like the Battle of Tannenberg in 1914. Three decades later historian Hajo Holborn would write “Hoffman and Ludendorff executed an oft-posed Schlieffen war game problem in a manner which would have delighted their military teacher.”

While beating the Russians, Schlieffen’s initial deployment in the West kept five corps back, with three corps and miscellaneous forces, including Landwehr, covering Alsace and Lorraine, while screening the Belgian and Dutch frontiers with light forces. Although the French opened with an invasion of Belgium, the British entered the war on their side anyway. The Dutch went to the Belgians’ aid, so that both countries became allies of Germany. As the French advanced through Belgium, they also attacked in Lorraine and Alsace, against both Metz and Strasbourg. While Germany moved some reserves by rail to reinforce the Belgians at Antwerp and Liege, other forces defeated the French in Alsace and Lorraine. As more German troops came into the theatre from the East following the defeat of the Russians, the Germans and their allies began a series of counteroffensives, which in the end led to two massive encirclements and the capture of several French field armies and the entire British Expeditionary Force. While rather improbable in its outcome, wargaming seems to have led Schlieffen to make some revisions to his “Memorandum” on the plan in 1906, to help cope with the presence of a British Army.

In 1906, the first wargame conducted after Moltke the Younger became Chief of the General Staff included more careful attention to logistics. It soon became clear that the First and Second Armies, on the far right of the great wheel, would run out of ammunition days before the campaign ended. As a result Moltke saw to it that Germany organized the two motor truck ammunition supply battalions, among the earliest motorized units in any army.

The Germans were not the only ones to learn from wargames. Italian participation in the Triple Alliance was partially prompted by several wargames that suggested Italy would not be able to win a war with Austria-Hungary, and the Italian commitment of strong forces to support the Germans in Alsace was undertaken partially because wargames demonstrated the virtual impossibility of success in an offensive against France across the Alps. Similarly, in 1905 the British wargamed a “Continental Commitment” which assumed that the Germans would attempt a sweeping movement through Belgium; not exactly a radical idea, since various intelligence services were increasingly aware of German plans. The outcome of the game suggested that the presence of a substantial British Expeditionary Force was essential to prevent the Germans from defeating France.

Wargames do have a down side. Used carelessly or with a priori assumptions wargames can lead to the wrong lessons being learned.

There is a good deal of evidence that, when designing wargames, Schlieffen manipulated the combat outcomes to favor the offensive for the Germans, while downplaying French offensive capabilities. Hermann von Kuhl (1856-1958), one of Schlieffen’s staff officers, who later had a very distinguished career as chief-of-staff to an army group for most of the Great War, wrote “Schlieffen usually altered now and then the General Staff rides and wargames . . . he often deliberately put difficulties before one commander, while he made the situation easier for the other.” Moreover, some lessons from wargames did not receive proper attention. In the 1905 game discussed above, the Germans had used interior lines and their superior rail network to good effect against both the Russians and the French. But no one seems to have considered that in an advance into France through Belgium, the French would be on interior lines, with a superior rail net at their disposal.

Several times during German gaming of an invasion of France, their armies had come up against French forces ensconced in “entrenched camps,” cities – Paris, Toul, Epinal, Verdun, Belfort – surrounded by rings of fortresses that were linked by elaborate earthworks, The largest of these in 1914 was the Camp of Paris, with a perimeter of about 78 miles (c. 125 km), and about 25 miles (c. 40 km) across, covering an area of about 490 square miles (c. 1,270 km2 – about 30 percent larger than New York City). On most of these occasions the German officers playing the French put up a stout defense, but stood pat, rather than attack the forces moving past their positions. Although in a 1911 wargame the “French” player made some spoiling attacks from Paris, all senior German commanders seem to have been convinced that entrenched camps need only be by-passed after being screened, a task for which Schlieffen assigned six Ersatzdivisionen to cover Paris. Neglecting the possibility that an entrenched camp could be used as a base of maneuver contributed to the disaster of 1914; On September 5th the newly formed French Sixth Army attacked out of Paris into the exposed left flank of the German First Army, initiating the Battle of the Marne.

Similarly, the Russians several times wargamed their invasion of East Prussia. Critical to the success of the operation was the need for careful coordination between the First Army, attacking from the East, and the Second Army, coming up from the South. At least one game revealed that, because the terrain through which the Second Army had to move was so difficult, if the First Army moved out too soon, there would be six days during which it would be in close contact with the Germans without the possibility of support from the Second Army. That would permit the Germans to confront the invading armies separately. Despite this, the plan was unaltered, resulting in the catastrophe at Tannenberg.

Wargames are useful only if those playing them are willing to heed their lessons.

 

HDMS Danmark Joins the U.S. Coast Guard

At the suggestion of the late President John F. Kennedy, in July of 1964 sail training ships from many nations gathered in New York to help celebrate the opening of the Worlds’ Fair of 1964-1965. Since then, from time to time, tall ships from around the world have taken part in “Operation Sail” to help mark some noted event, such as the bicentennial of the American Revolution or the Columbian quincentenary, in the process also commemorating the great age of sail and all who go down to the sea in ships.

Whenever the tall ships enter an American port, the procession is led by the Coast Guard’s own sail training ship, the bark Eagle. The vessel immediately behind Eagle is always the full rigged ship Danmark. This is to commemorate the service of His Danish Majesty’s Ship Danmark with the Coast Guard during the Second World War.

When Hitler overran Denmark, on April 9, 1940, Danmark, then just eight years old, was in the United States to help celebrate the New York Worlds’ Fair of 1939-1940. King Christian X (r. 1912-1947) quietly ordered the ship to remain in America. Her crew of about 120 officers and enlisted men plus 80 or so cadets were looked after by the Danish diplomatic community and Danish-Americans, both alike anti-Nazi. Many of the cadets and some of the crew left the ship to serve in the Danish merchant marine, which generally adhered to the Allies.

With Hitler’s declaration of war on the United States in December of 1941, Captain Knud Hansen offered Danmark as a training vessel. The Coast Guard took up the offer. From then until shortly after the end of the Second World War Danmark was used to train some 5,000 Coast Guard officer cadets in seamanship. Aside from one or two American liaison officers, all training and instruction was done by the remaining Danish personnel.

The Coast Guard returned Danmark to Denmark in 1946, but having found the training she had provided so useful, acquired a tall ship of its own, the Eagle, which had begun life a decade earlier as a training ship for the German Navy.

 


© 1998 - 2019 StrategyWorld.com. All rights Reserved.
StrategyWorld.com, StrategyPage.com, FYEO, For Your Eyes Only and Al Nofi's CIC are all trademarks of StrategyWorld.com
Privacy Policy